NONO. NO. NO. NONONONONO.
I’M NOT SURE WHAT’S UPSETTING ME ABOUT THIS SO COMPLETELY BUT THERE CANNOT BE A MICHELLE MALKIN POST ABOUT SCHUMIN. THERE SIMPLY CANNOT BE.
IT’S…NO. THERE IS WRONGNESS AND A CLIFF AND WHATSIT. HELL.
I CAN’T PUT TOGETHER A SENTENCE PROPERLY AND I CAN’T GET OUT OF CAPS EITHER. NO. NONONONO.
March 15th, 2007 14:13
Wow. Just…wow.
March 15th, 2007 15:57
Just damn.
March 15th, 2007 16:37
The enemy of my enemy SKWEEEERRRRRRABORT, RETRY, FAIL?
March 15th, 2007 23:14
Forget it, Marge. It’s Chinatown!
March 15th, 2007 23:57
Is there any more perfect distillation of this woman’s irrelevance as a reporter, as a commentator, and as a writer? Leaving aside her bigoted vituperative fulminations — what seems to pass in this country as “commentary” by Very Serious People(TM) these days — how does anyone on the clock, drawing a paycheck, justify this kind of utter fluff? The woman needs her pay docked.
BTW, you should put up your Zoomin’ for a Schumin pages again, to serve as counterpoint. And also to point out that Michelle is about eight years behind the curve.
March 15th, 2007 23:59
Oh, there it is. Sorry…
March 16th, 2007 08:40
Y’know, I’m half-tempted to go see what kind of dumbfuckery is in the making here, but it’s just not worth it to drive to the closest Metro stop on a Saturday and head into DC just on the off chance of spotting the dude in a crowd so I can point and laugh.
Especially since the types of people I’d be dealing with are the same ones who were leaving the comments at the bottom of the “Anarchists and Radical Youth Bloc” page Malkin linked from the end of the article.
March 16th, 2007 09:18
I knew you were cheating on us.
March 16th, 2007 09:57
This wasn’t actually posted by Malkin, it was a guest post by this guy over here. Ironically, he says “I think Michelle would approve”.
I didn’t realize it wasn’t her at first, either, but that only mitigates it a little bit.
March 16th, 2007 12:46
And now they’re apparently flaming him, and some are sending him threats. (At least that’s what he says.) Am I the only one who finds the idea that people bother enough to get seriously angry with him for poltical reasons kind of strange?
March 16th, 2007 17:12
My god.. he went from furiouslymasturbating@schuminweb.com to just furious.
March 23rd, 2007 00:24
I did my own follow-up on the Malkinites’ flames:
http://www.schuminweb.com/schumin-web/journal/2007-permalink.asp?id=42
After the initial shock, I found it quite amusing…
March 24th, 2007 13:55
Photographing something: Support it 100%. Hmmm, I wonder about the photos Malkin took of the anti-war protestors.